Image by thomwisdom via Flickr
The problem with saying something in a very clever way is that a listener may suspect you are saying it only because it is clever, paradoxical, a way of getting attention, about as sincere as dying your hair pink. And thinking so, as I watched the play, I decided that Jack Tanner was essentially a blogger, of the jokey kind, to solid argument as the canape is to the good roast beef.
Such writers assume you'll pass by his/her blog the way you pass by a lively conversation at a cocktail party: a few will stop but most will take ten seconds worth and keep moving. A blogger of this kind makes his point on the fly and hopes the listener will be prodded to consider the implications of the exaggeration, that the tickle will turn into a thought.
Thus: Kos and Superkos is not apt. The Daily Kos
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d06f8/d06f85cec30148b06da82e30a47f0c26fda50b27" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d06f8/d06f85cec30148b06da82e30a47f0c26fda50b27" alt=""
And maybe that's what a good Shavian witticism is, a link to deeper thoughts and more detailed consideration. There's a competition for attention going on in the world. When it comes to "issues," a really good joke -- a paradox, a joke so droll you want to commit it to memory for the effect if not the message -- is one way to grab some part of that attention.
Yes, once Jack Tanner is settled down and married to Ann Whitfield, he will definitely blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment